2/18/2023 0 Comments Revisions marquette![]() Ten years later, two fighter jets nearly collided with a UFO hovering at the exact location and altitude of an entrance point to a military training range. Importantly, the object’s movement did not suggest hostility as much as a desire to be observed by the aircrew, which ultimately “ flew right up to the thing.”Ī UFO involved in the now famous 2004 “Tic Tac” incidents appeared on radar at the precise location of a rendezvous point known only to a small group of aviators and radar operators. East Coast indicates that the object reacted as a Navy fighter jet attempted to sneak up behind it. The geometrically reconstructed flight path of a well-known 2015 UFO encounter off the U.S. Unsurprisingly, this remarkable shift in attitudes towards UFOs is fostering a broader, richer discussion of the phenomenon.Ĭomedian and political commentator Bill Maher, for example, recently theorized that UFOs are intentionally revealing themselves to fighter pilots. Of note, former presidents continue receiving the government’s most sensitive intelligence briefings. Clinton, in particular, scolded a television audience for laughing when a host asked him about UFOs. For his part, former President Obama speculated openly about contact with extraterrestrial life when asked about recent military UFO encounters.Īfter the customary giggles and smirks that still accompany any mention of “UFO” died down, both Clinton and Obama adopted a serious, matter-of-fact demeanor when discussing the topic. ![]() Moreover, former President Clinton refers reflexively to the high likelihood of otherworldly life in the universe when asked about UFOs. ![]() Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of “UFO” excludes “man-made” objects. Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have that we are not capable of defending against” (among several other eyebrow-raising comments). It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence. A report accompanying the legislation notes that “transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially.” ![]() In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. The revised definition of “UFO” also includes “transmedium” objects which, according to lawmakers, “transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.” As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking revisions to the definition of “UFO.” Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins.Īs first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence rebrands UFOs as “unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.” Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs. ( The Hill) – In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |